disclaimer
VIEW

Best Viewed in:
1024x768 px
Mozilla Firefox
profile
Me,MYSELF

Jus
tagboard
=O


archives
Past Posts

January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009

links
FRIENDS

Alex
Amanda:)
Brian
Corn
Donnie
Ethel
Eugenia
Jabez
Jeremy
JoelMO
Jude
Julian
Jun Hao
Lionel
Mabel
Marcus
Melissa
Melly
Meng Wee
Nicholas Lim
Ryan:)
Sam Chan
Sam Goh
Sam Leo
Serene
Shao Wei
Shawn
Tim
Le Grande

credit

1 2 3

Sunday, September 28, 2008

There was a spate of articles in the papers recently about how ‘indecent’ the salaries were of religious group leaders, and their involvement in businesses. You can read here, here and here.

For better or worse, the conduct of various charities and religious organisations have been put under the microscope because of the NKF scandal. Most recently, we saw how the CEO of Ren Ci Hospital, the Venerable Shi Ming Yi, was accused of misusing donations. The need for charities to be above-the-board, whiter-than-white in their wheeling and dealing is a must, since they are using public funds. And, for the longest of time, they were operating with very little oversight or questioning by the public till the NKF scandal opened the can of worms.

Now, with news of mega churches involved in businesses, I suspect another round of questioning will arise. “As poor as the church mouse”, goes the idiom. Obviously, it doesn’t really hold true today. However, is it right for the public to expect religious (all religions, not just Christianity) leaders to be ‘poor’, or at least appear to be poor? Is it fair?

People like to quote ‘money is the root of all evil’, without realising they are actually mis-quoting the Bible. Actually, it reads ‘For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.’ (1 Timothy 6:10) Money in itself is amoral. But, when greed comes into the picture, problem arise. If you examine the recent scandals we have with charities, essentially it is a problem of greed.

Too much money is a problem. On the other hand, too little money is a problem. One of the letters to the forum quoted (again) from the Bible of the example of the Levites. The Levites were supposed to be the priests to the people of Biblical Israel. While the Levites looked after the spiritual well-being of the Israelites, in return the Israelites look after the physical well-being of the Levites. The Levites were forbidden to own any riches. The writer to the forum implored the religious leaders to follow the example of the Levites and be poor.


Do you think the writer has a point? Is it feasible?

Labels:


7:17:00 PM